In Which I Decide to Stay Home on Saturday Night
Tonight I was invited to a party, a 40th-birthday party for a friend in the neighborhood. This friend and his wife always have fun, boisterous parties and I was looking forward to going. But I am too tired, and fighting off something, some kind of cold or allergy or virus. When I got back from the library this afternoon, after a long subway ride, all I could think about was, "I have to eat mango sorbet and take a nap."
So I did both of those things. When I woke up I called a friend to discuss the situation. I said, "I'm supposed to go to a party but I'm sick." She said, as I knew she would, "So stay home. Go to sleep." I said, "I've already been sleeping, but maybe I'll have a bowl of soup and go back to sleep."
It felt good to give up the idea of the party, to not think about what to wear and putting in my contacts. You know, just in case.
I had soup, more mango sorbet, dosed myself up with whatever over-the-counter remedies I could find, and watched TV. Miraculously, there was a baseball game on network TV, the second game of the Mets' doubleheader against the Washington National. Which the Mets lost, sadly. But it was a close game, and exciting to watch. I tried to understand the announcers' analysis of the manager's decisions, one of which, a complicated series of replacements for a player who injured his hamstring (or should I say, as they did, his "hammy"), they both found puzzling. I find it amusing how the announcers tend to return again and again to pondering whether a particular decision was a mistake or not (perhaps because I do this too!). During the suspense-filled ninth inning, with the Mets down by one run, one of them would say, "Willie Randolph has backed himself into a corner." Then the other would say, "Yes, and it didn't have to be that way. By putting in X player when Y hurt his hamstring when he knew he would have to use Z anyway, he left himself in this position, with no one to bat against the Nationals' closer except . . . . A PITCHER." You could almost hear them shaking their heads. Then the first guy would say, "He left himself with a short bench." Then the other would say (for about the tenth time), "Yes, and the reason the bench is short is of course because of the double header. He had to send A and B down so that C and D could come up for the second game." Yes, I know that they have to keep repeating things in case people are "just tuning in," and it is helpful for those of us who are having trouble following the intricacies of the manager's strategy in the first place, but I still find it amusing. But I also find it questionable as a strategy for life--I mean, it's everything I try to get myself not to do, go over and over a decision that's already been made. And then, also, do they have to seem so pleased about being right? Poor Willie Randolph I'm sure is raking himself over the coals without their help.
I wrote above that I went to the library today, but what I meant was that I went to the campus where I teach to pick up some books--examination copies--from the office I share with a number of other adjuncts. The campus library is not open on Saturdays in the summer, and I thought I would then take the books to another library and do some reading and preparing for teaching, but when I got to the adjunct office I found myself happy to just stay there and read. It was entirely empty--in fact, there was nobody at all on the floor, all the offices were locked--but the air conditioning was on, and it's a big room, and I have pleasant associations of being there and talking to my adjunct pals, so I like it there. There is one desk that has an old-fashioned desk lamp with a cloth shade that casts a nice glow, so I put that on to counteract the flourescent ceiling lights (no windows in this room), and I plugged in the boom box next to the desk and was able to listen to music while I read poetry that I am going to teach in the fall. It felt good to be preparing and to be thinking about teaching.
And now, although it is warm and humid outside, there is a little breeze coming into my apartment, and I am enjoying that--and being home--very much.
So I did both of those things. When I woke up I called a friend to discuss the situation. I said, "I'm supposed to go to a party but I'm sick." She said, as I knew she would, "So stay home. Go to sleep." I said, "I've already been sleeping, but maybe I'll have a bowl of soup and go back to sleep."
It felt good to give up the idea of the party, to not think about what to wear and putting in my contacts. You know, just in case.
I had soup, more mango sorbet, dosed myself up with whatever over-the-counter remedies I could find, and watched TV. Miraculously, there was a baseball game on network TV, the second game of the Mets' doubleheader against the Washington National. Which the Mets lost, sadly. But it was a close game, and exciting to watch. I tried to understand the announcers' analysis of the manager's decisions, one of which, a complicated series of replacements for a player who injured his hamstring (or should I say, as they did, his "hammy"), they both found puzzling. I find it amusing how the announcers tend to return again and again to pondering whether a particular decision was a mistake or not (perhaps because I do this too!). During the suspense-filled ninth inning, with the Mets down by one run, one of them would say, "Willie Randolph has backed himself into a corner." Then the other would say, "Yes, and it didn't have to be that way. By putting in X player when Y hurt his hamstring when he knew he would have to use Z anyway, he left himself in this position, with no one to bat against the Nationals' closer except . . . . A PITCHER." You could almost hear them shaking their heads. Then the first guy would say, "He left himself with a short bench." Then the other would say (for about the tenth time), "Yes, and the reason the bench is short is of course because of the double header. He had to send A and B down so that C and D could come up for the second game." Yes, I know that they have to keep repeating things in case people are "just tuning in," and it is helpful for those of us who are having trouble following the intricacies of the manager's strategy in the first place, but I still find it amusing. But I also find it questionable as a strategy for life--I mean, it's everything I try to get myself not to do, go over and over a decision that's already been made. And then, also, do they have to seem so pleased about being right? Poor Willie Randolph I'm sure is raking himself over the coals without their help.
I wrote above that I went to the library today, but what I meant was that I went to the campus where I teach to pick up some books--examination copies--from the office I share with a number of other adjuncts. The campus library is not open on Saturdays in the summer, and I thought I would then take the books to another library and do some reading and preparing for teaching, but when I got to the adjunct office I found myself happy to just stay there and read. It was entirely empty--in fact, there was nobody at all on the floor, all the offices were locked--but the air conditioning was on, and it's a big room, and I have pleasant associations of being there and talking to my adjunct pals, so I like it there. There is one desk that has an old-fashioned desk lamp with a cloth shade that casts a nice glow, so I put that on to counteract the flourescent ceiling lights (no windows in this room), and I plugged in the boom box next to the desk and was able to listen to music while I read poetry that I am going to teach in the fall. It felt good to be preparing and to be thinking about teaching.
And now, although it is warm and humid outside, there is a little breeze coming into my apartment, and I am enjoying that--and being home--very much.
